Structure: Introduction → Methodology → Results → Discussion → Recommendations → Conclusion
Replacement of Soling with Interlocking Concrete Tiles for Campus Pathways
Prepared
For: Principal, Govt Graduate College
Burewala
Prepared By: Civil Engineering Department
Date: 28 October 2025
Location: GGCB Main Campus (Phase I: Admin Block to Science Block
Pathway)
1- Introduction
Context:
Existing gravel soling pathways at
GGCB face recurring issues:
- Monsoon
Damage: 70%
erosion during July-August rains (2023–2024 data)
- Safety
Hazards: Uneven
surfaces cause 3–5 slip incidents/month
- High
Maintenance: Annual
repair cost: ₨350,000 for 1.2 km pathways
Objective:
Evaluate performance of interlocking concrete tiles (ICT) as a durable,
low-maintenance alternative to soling.
2- Methodology
Materials & Installation
Component | Specification |
---|---|
Base Layer |
150mm compacted gravel (20mm aggregate)
|
Bedding Layer |
50mm coarse sand
|
Surface Layer |
80mm thick ICT
Hexagonal pattern
|
Joint Filler |
Silica sand
|
Test Section |
200m pathway
Admin to Science Block
|
Testing
Protocol
1. Load Testing:
o Simulate foot traffic (500 students/hour) +
light vehicles (e.g., maintenance carts)
o ASTM C936 standards (axial load capacity ≥50
MPa)
2. Drainage Efficiency:
o Measure permeability (L/m²/min) during
simulated monsoon (50mm/hr rainfall)
3. Durability:
o Accelerated wear test (500,000 cycles @ Punjab
Transport Research Centre)
3- Results (3-Month Performance: Aug–Oct 2025)
Parameter | ICT Pathway | Existing Soling | Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Surface Stability | Zero erosion | 35% surface loss | 100% |
Slip Resistance | 0.75 (COF) | 0.45 (COF) | 67% ↑ |
Drainage Rate | 450 L/m²/min | 120 L/m²/min | 275% ↑ |
Maintenance Cost | ₨0 (so far) | ₨87,500/km/quarter | 100% ↓ |
Installation Time | 10 days | 5 days (but repairs every 2 months) | – |
Load
Test Data
- Axial Load
Capacity: 62 MPa
(exceeds ASTM standard)
- Deflection: 1.2mm under 5-ton load
(permissible: ≤2mm)
4- Discussion
Technical
Advantages:
- Monsoon
Resilience: Tile
joints prevent water pooling; 450 L/m²/min drainage vs. soling’s 120
L/m²/min.
- Modular
Repairs: Damaged
tiles replaced individually (cost: ₨200/tile vs. ₨25,000 soling
repair/10m).
- Thermal
Performance: Surface
temp 8°C lower than asphalt in summer (45°C vs. 53°C).
Limitations
Observed:
- Initial
Cost: ₨1,800/m² (ICT) vs. ₨900/m²
(soling) – offset by 5-year lifecycle savings.
- Installation
Skill: Requires
trained masons for leveling (solved: Punjab Vocational Training provided).
Burewala-Specific
Adaptation:
- Tile
color: Terracotta red (reduces glare vs. grey)
- Joint width:
5mm (accommodates thermal expansion @ 45°C)
5- Recommendations
Design
Improvements:
1. Use polymeric sand in joints
to further reduce weed growth (cost: +₨50/m²).
2. Install edge restraints along
curves to prevent tile displacement.
Implementation Strategy:
Phase | Pathway Section | Timeline | Cost (₨) |
---|---|---|---|
I | Admin-Science Block | Aug 2025 | 360,000 |
II | Library-New Block | Nov 2025 | 540,000 |
III | Rana Asghar Block | Jan 2026 | 720,000 |
Project Total: | 1,620,000 |
Student
Training:
- Incorporate
ICT installation into Civil Engineering labs (material testing + laying
techniques).
Conclusion:
ICT pathways eliminate monsoon erosion, reduce slip risks by 67%, and cut
5-year maintenance costs by ₨1.2 million/km compared to soling. Phase I results
validate full-campus rollout.
Attachments:
- A: Load test
certification (Punjab PWD)
- B: Drainage
simulation videos
- C: Vendor quotations (Chenab Tiles, Lahore)
Part of GCUF Report Series: See all resources in our Report Writing Hub
No comments