Home
Engineering Reports
Lab Report Format
Report Writing
Technical Report Writing
Sample Technical Report
July 11, 2025

Sample Technical Report

Structure: Introduction → Methodology → Results → Discussion → Recommendations → Conclusion


Replacement of Soling with Interlocking Concrete Tiles for Campus Pathways

 

Prepared For: Principal, Govt Graduate College Burewala
Prepared By: Civil Engineering Department
Date: 28 October 2025
Location: GGCB Main Campus (Phase I: Admin Block to Science Block Pathway)


1- Introduction

Context:
Existing gravel soling pathways at GGCB face recurring issues:

  • Monsoon Damage: 70% erosion during July-August rains (2023–2024 data)
  • Safety Hazards: Uneven surfaces cause 3–5 slip incidents/month
  • High Maintenance: Annual repair cost: ₨350,000 for 1.2 km pathways

Objective:
Evaluate performance of interlocking concrete tiles (ICT) as a durable, low-maintenance alternative to soling.


2- Methodology

Materials & Installation

Component Specification
Base Layer
150mm compacted gravel (20mm aggregate)
Bedding Layer
50mm coarse sand
Surface Layer
80mm thick ICT
Hexagonal pattern
Joint Filler
Silica sand
Test Section
200m pathway
Admin to Science Block

Testing Protocol

1.   Load Testing:

o   Simulate foot traffic (500 students/hour) + light vehicles (e.g., maintenance carts)

o   ASTM C936 standards (axial load capacity ≥50 MPa)

2.   Drainage Efficiency:

o   Measure permeability (L/m²/min) during simulated monsoon (50mm/hr rainfall)

3.   Durability:

o   Accelerated wear test (500,000 cycles @ Punjab Transport Research Centre)


3- Results (3-Month Performance: Aug–Oct 2025)

Parameter ICT Pathway Existing Soling Improvement
Surface Stability Zero erosion 35% surface loss 100%
Slip Resistance 0.75 (COF) 0.45 (COF) 67%
Drainage Rate 450 L/m²/min 120 L/m²/min 275%
Maintenance Cost ₨0 (so far) ₨87,500/km/quarter 100%
Installation Time 10 days 5 days (but repairs every 2 months)

Load Test Data

  • Axial Load Capacity: 62 MPa (exceeds ASTM standard)
  • Deflection: 1.2mm under 5-ton load (permissible: ≤2mm)

4- Discussion

Technical Advantages:

  • Monsoon Resilience: Tile joints prevent water pooling; 450 L/m²/min drainage vs. soling’s 120 L/m²/min.
  • Modular Repairs: Damaged tiles replaced individually (cost: ₨200/tile vs. ₨25,000 soling repair/10m).
  • Thermal Performance: Surface temp 8°C lower than asphalt in summer (45°C vs. 53°C).

Limitations Observed:

  • Initial Cost: ₨1,800/m² (ICT) vs. ₨900/m² (soling) – offset by 5-year lifecycle savings.
  • Installation Skill: Requires trained masons for leveling (solved: Punjab Vocational Training provided).

Burewala-Specific Adaptation:

  • Tile color: Terracotta red (reduces glare vs. grey)
  • Joint width: 5mm (accommodates thermal expansion @ 45°C)

5- Recommendations

Design Improvements:

1.   Use polymeric sand in joints to further reduce weed growth (cost: +₨50/m²).

2.   Install edge restraints along curves to prevent tile displacement.

Implementation Strategy:

Phase Pathway Section Timeline Cost (₨)
I Admin-Science Block Aug 2025 360,000
II Library-New Block Nov 2025 540,000
III Rana Asghar Block Jan 2026 720,000
Project Total: 1,620,000

Student Training:

  • Incorporate ICT installation into Civil Engineering labs (material testing + laying techniques).

Conclusion:
ICT pathways eliminate monsoon erosion, reduce slip risks by 67%, and cut 5-year maintenance costs by ₨1.2 million/km compared to soling. Phase I results validate full-campus rollout.

Attachments:

  • A: Load test certification (Punjab PWD)
  • B: Drainage simulation videos
  • C: Vendor quotations (Chenab Tiles, Lahore)

Part of GCUF Report Series: See all resources in our Report Writing Hub

No comments